Leadership Analysis: The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riot case study Part 2

ORDER THE PAPER NOW!

You will analyze your selected case study for the ethics that
were used to address the problem. You will evaluate how leadership addressed the problem and whether they used ethical decision-making.
Prompt: Using your selected case study, complete the following critical elements for the assignment:
A. Determine the ethicality of leadership’s decision making in their attempts to address the problem. Be sure to justify your response and support your
response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
B. Evaluate the transparency of the organization in regard to public communications. Be sure to justify your response. For example, are systems in place to
communicate with the public? Has the organization been readily available and willing to provide the community with information regarding the
problem?
C. Evaluate how leadership of the organization considered the ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem. Be sure to justify your
response. For example, how were the concerns of internal and external stakeholders considered?
D. Determine how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the performance of employees in addressing the problem. How might these decisions
improve employees’ ability to address the problem? How might they hinder their ability to address the problem?
E. Determine how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the culture of the organization. For example, what if employees do not agree with the
decisions?
F. Explain the overall implications of the ethical decision-making of leadership and how that affects the organization and community. Be sure to justify
your response, and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.

ORDER THE PAPER NOW!