Evaluation of Health Care Technology

ORDER THE PAPER NOW!

Evaluation of Health Care Technology

Details:           

For this assignment, you will utilize content from the course materials as well as additional qualified resources to synthesize new information that you can apply towards your DPI Project, your future work area, or your clinical practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments.
  • Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.

Directions:

For this assignment, write a 1,100 word paper in which you:

  1. Select a technology that has been explored in the course.
  2. Using the technology you have selected, define and describe how the element would be measured or evaluated.
  3. Using the content in the textbook and other readings, list three elements that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface.
  4. Perform an assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine functionality.
  5. For each element, propose practicable suggestions for improvement using support from the literature.

Textbook

  1. Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine

Read Chapters 4 and 13 in Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine.

Electronic Resource

  1. Taking Data Seriously: The Value of Actor-Network Theory in Rethinking Patient Experience Data

Read:

Desai, A., Zoccatelli, G., Adams, M., Allen, D., Brearley, S., Rafferty, A. M., . . . Donetto, S. (2017). Taking data seriously: The value of actor-network theory in rethinking patient experience data. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 22(2), 134-136.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347359/

Apply Rubrics

Evaluation of Health Care Technology 

  1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content  
10.0 %Selection of a Specific Technology Explored in This Course Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is not present. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is marginal or incomplete. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is perfunctory. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is present. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Assessment Performed Using Elements of User-Technology Interface or Human Factors Methods to Determine Existing Functionality of the Specified Technology An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is not present. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is marginal or incomplete. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory level. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %List With Support for Three Elements of the Specified Technology That Will Be Used to Evaluate the User-Technology Interface Using the Course Content A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is not present. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present but marginal or incomplete. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present but at a perfunctory level. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Definition of Each Element of the Specified Technology Identified and Description of How Each Element Would Be Measured or Evaluated A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are not present. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present but marginal or incomplete. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present but at a perfunctory level. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Proposal That Employs Support From the Literature to Provide Practicable Suggestions for Improvement in the Use of Each Element of the Specified Technology A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is not present. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present but marginal or incomplete. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory level. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness  
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format  
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

 

ORDER THE PAPER NOW!